Comparative evaluation of gingival response following the placement of light-cured dressing and noneugenol dressing after periodontal flap surgery: A clinical study

Comparative evaluation of gingival response following the placement of light-cured dressing and noneugenol dressing after periodontal flap surgery: A clinical study

Blog Article

Aim: The aim of the study was to compare light-cured dressing with most widely used noneugenol pack in the perspective of esthetics, acceptance, and healing following periodontal flap surgery.Materials and Methods: Fifty-eight patients suffering from generalized chronic periodontitis, requiring periodontal flap surgery Computer Components on contralateral sides of the arch, were selected and divided randomly into Group I (control) and Group II (test).In Group I, a noneugenol dressing and in Group II light-cured dressing were applied after flap surgery.Clinical parameters such as debris index, plaque index, and modified gingival index were recorded at baseline (day 0) and 10 days postoperatively (after M SNEAKERS removal of the dressing).

The data were collected and statistically analyzed.Results: Group II showed better results than Group I when debris index, plaque index, and modified gingival index scores were compared though the differences were not statistically significant.Patients found no unpleasant taste/smell and perceived the light-cured dressing to be better.Conclusion: The noneugenol dressing retained more plaque on its undersurface than light-cure dressing.

However, this did not have much influence on the healing outcome and clinical gingival parameters, which were optimal and comparable in both groups.The greater number of patients showed a preference for light-cure dressing, based on its superior esthetics and taste.